<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1723 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312702</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding mis-declaration of imported transmission apparatus valuation. The Court found that software embedded in equipment before supply was not post-importation activity and should be included in import valuation under Rule 9/10. Out of 19 items in Bill of Entry, only 8 were physically presented while others were embedded in the main unit. The Court applied Note 4 of Section XVI, treating individual components as one apparatus for classification purposes. The Department correctly invoked valuation principles including technical assistance fees. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s inclusion of software and services in import value determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2024 20:27:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1723 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312702</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding mis-declaration of imported transmission apparatus valuation. The Court found that software embedded in equipment before supply was not post-importation activity and should be included in import valuation under Rule 9/10. Out of 19 items in Bill of Entry, only 8 were physically presented while others were embedded in the main unit. The Court applied Note 4 of Section XVI, treating individual components as one apparatus for classification purposes. The Department correctly invoked valuation principles including technical assistance fees. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s inclusion of software and services in import value determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>