<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 624 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312695</link>
    <description>Where the applicable sales tax law treats transfer of the right to use goods as a sale, a leasing transaction of machinery delivered and leased outside Uttar Pradesh did not amount to a violation of the declaration conditions attached to Form C under Section 10(d); the finding of no default was upheld in favour of the assessee. Once the original penalty for breach of Section 10(d) was found unsustainable, remand to explore a fresh charge under another clause was unwarranted, because concluded penalty proceedings could not be revived by giving the assessing authority a new opportunity to alter the basis of default. The penalty order was therefore quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 624 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312695</link>
      <description>Where the applicable sales tax law treats transfer of the right to use goods as a sale, a leasing transaction of machinery delivered and leased outside Uttar Pradesh did not amount to a violation of the declaration conditions attached to Form C under Section 10(d); the finding of no default was upheld in favour of the assessee. Once the original penalty for breach of Section 10(d) was found unsustainable, remand to explore a fresh charge under another clause was unwarranted, because concluded penalty proceedings could not be revived by giving the assessing authority a new opportunity to alter the basis of default. The penalty order was therefore quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>