<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 86 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450305</link>
    <description>CESTAT Hyderabad held that Social Welfare Surcharge (SWS) is not leviable when Basic Customs Duty (BCD) is exempted under Notifications 24/2015 and 25/2015 for goods imported under MEIS/SEIS schemes. The tribunal ruled that SWS calculation under Section 110(3) of Finance Act 2018 requires actual collection of duties, not notional amounts. Since BCD was fully exempted and no physical realization occurred (only scrip debit), the aggregate of collected duties was nil, making SWS nil. Appeals allowed; refund ordered with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2024 07:23:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 86 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450305</link>
      <description>CESTAT Hyderabad held that Social Welfare Surcharge (SWS) is not leviable when Basic Customs Duty (BCD) is exempted under Notifications 24/2015 and 25/2015 for goods imported under MEIS/SEIS schemes. The tribunal ruled that SWS calculation under Section 110(3) of Finance Act 2018 requires actual collection of duties, not notional amounts. Since BCD was fully exempted and no physical realization occurred (only scrip debit), the aggregate of collected duties was nil, making SWS nil. Appeals allowed; refund ordered with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>