https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450304 CESTAT Ahmedabad remanded a case involving SHIS Scheme benefits for imported Turning Cradle and Blade Shell Lifting Device back to Commissioner for fresh adjudication. The appellant sought cross-examination of government approved valuer who revised his assessment report. Despite revenue's claim that all necessary documents were provided, CESTAT granted one final opportunity for cross-examination to determine reasons for the valuer's changed stance. Commissioner directed to provide two hearing dates and follow natural justice principles. Appeal allowed by way of remand with specific directions for proper adjudication. en-us Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Mar 2024 07:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450304 CESTAT Ahmedabad remanded a case involving SHIS Scheme benefits for imported Turning Cradle and Blade Shell Lifting Device back to Commissioner for fresh adjudication. The appellant sought cross-examination of government approved valuer who revised his assessment report. Despite revenue's claim that all necessary documents were provided, CESTAT granted one final opportunity for cross-examination to determine reasons for the valuer's changed stance. Commissioner directed to provide two hearing dates and follow natural justice principles. Appeal allowed by way of remand with specific directions for proper adjudication. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450304