<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 81 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450300</link>
    <description>A debt assignee is not automatically disqualified from committee of creditors participation merely because the assignor was a related party financial creditor, but the assignment must be scrutinised for good faith. The first proviso to Section 21(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be bypassed through a colourable transfer of debt designed to secure indirect CoC entry. Where the assignment occurs during CIRP, the claim is filed immediately, and the assignor retains substantial beneficial interest, the assignee may be treated as akin to a related party and excluded from representation, participation and voting rights. On these facts, the NCLAT upheld exclusion and found no basis to interfere.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2024 06:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 81 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450300</link>
      <description>A debt assignee is not automatically disqualified from committee of creditors participation merely because the assignor was a related party financial creditor, but the assignment must be scrutinised for good faith. The first proviso to Section 21(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be bypassed through a colourable transfer of debt designed to secure indirect CoC entry. Where the assignment occurs during CIRP, the claim is filed immediately, and the assignor retains substantial beneficial interest, the assignee may be treated as akin to a related party and excluded from representation, participation and voting rights. On these facts, the NCLAT upheld exclusion and found no basis to interfere.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>