<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 78 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450297</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal by home buyer seeking direction for conveyance deed execution and rent payment from corporate debtor under CIRP. Tribunal held that allottees cannot claim conveyance deed execution as a right during insolvency proceedings. Resolution Professional has discretion to manage corporate debtor&#039;s business operations. While allottees&#039; rights must be protected during CIRP, the manner of protection depends on case-specific facts and RP&#039;s management decisions. Regarding rent payments, NCLAT noted that rent from allotted units was kept in fixed deposit for disbursement per law, adequately protecting allottees&#039; interests. Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order was upheld as it appropriately balanced stakeholder interests during ongoing resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2024 06:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 78 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450297</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal by home buyer seeking direction for conveyance deed execution and rent payment from corporate debtor under CIRP. Tribunal held that allottees cannot claim conveyance deed execution as a right during insolvency proceedings. Resolution Professional has discretion to manage corporate debtor&#039;s business operations. While allottees&#039; rights must be protected during CIRP, the manner of protection depends on case-specific facts and RP&#039;s management decisions. Regarding rent payments, NCLAT noted that rent from allotted units was kept in fixed deposit for disbursement per law, adequately protecting allottees&#039; interests. Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order was upheld as it appropriately balanced stakeholder interests during ongoing resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>