https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450295 Section 482 CrPC cannot be invoked as a substitute for approaching the forum whose proceedings are said to be affected, and the High Court declined to use its inherent power to enforce or protect alleged sanctity of pending proceedings before the Supreme Court and NGT. A communication issued by the Enforcement Directorate under Section 66(2) PMLA was treated as statutory information, not an impermissible direction to register an FIR, and the petitioner failed to show any breach of that provision. Interference at the threshold was held inappropriate where the predicate offences were cognizable and the investigation was ongoing. en-us Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Mar 2024 06:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450295 Section 482 CrPC cannot be invoked as a substitute for approaching the forum whose proceedings are said to be affected, and the High Court declined to use its inherent power to enforce or protect alleged sanctity of pending proceedings before the Supreme Court and NGT. A communication issued by the Enforcement Directorate under Section 66(2) PMLA was treated as statutory information, not an impermissible direction to register an FIR, and the petitioner failed to show any breach of that provision. Interference at the threshold was held inappropriate where the predicate offences were cognizable and the investigation was ongoing. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450295