https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312692 Delhi HC held that trademark opposition rejections based on four-month limitation period were incorrect given SC's pandemic-related limitation extensions. Court permitted opposition filing on technical grounds while clarifying this would not affect merits of pending disputes between parties. Opposition proceedings to continue per law without impacting existing suit or other disputes. Matters listed for status reports from CGPTDM office. en-us Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Mar 2024 05:42:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312692 Delhi HC held that trademark opposition rejections based on four-month limitation period were incorrect given SC's pandemic-related limitation extensions. Court permitted opposition filing on technical grounds while clarifying this would not affect merits of pending disputes between parties. Opposition proceedings to continue per law without impacting existing suit or other disputes. Matters listed for status reports from CGPTDM office. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312692