<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1418 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312689</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by operational creditor challenging rejection of Section 9 IBC application. The tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s finding that pre-existing disputes existed between parties, evidenced by email correspondence prior to statutory notice under Section 8 IBC. Since disputes were raised before the notice, the operational creditor&#039;s insolvency petition was correctly rejected. The appellant failed to deny or challenge the email evidence establishing the pre-existing dispute, confirming the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision was proper.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2024 05:42:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1418 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312689</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by operational creditor challenging rejection of Section 9 IBC application. The tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s finding that pre-existing disputes existed between parties, evidenced by email correspondence prior to statutory notice under Section 8 IBC. Since disputes were raised before the notice, the operational creditor&#039;s insolvency petition was correctly rejected. The appellant failed to deny or challenge the email evidence establishing the pre-existing dispute, confirming the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision was proper.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>