<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1305 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312683</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC quashed reopening of assessment under Section 147. The petitioner had average net losses of Rs. 187.67 crores over three preceding financial years, thus not obligated to spend on CSR under Section 135. The expenditure was commercial and allowable under Section 37(1). The court found reopening was based on audit party objection without tangible material and constituted impermissible change of opinion, as detailed scrutiny was already conducted without additions or disallowances in original assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 18:03:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1305 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312683</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC quashed reopening of assessment under Section 147. The petitioner had average net losses of Rs. 187.67 crores over three preceding financial years, thus not obligated to spend on CSR under Section 135. The expenditure was commercial and allowable under Section 37(1). The court found reopening was based on audit party objection without tangible material and constituted impermissible change of opinion, as detailed scrutiny was already conducted without additions or disallowances in original assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>