<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1488 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312682</link>
    <description>The HC held that the notice under Section 148 for AY 2014-15, issued to a company post-amalgamation, was invalid as it was addressed to a non-existent entity. The petitioner had informed the jurisdictional AO about the amalgamation, which was acknowledged. Consequently, the HC quashed the notice dated 27.3.2021, the show cause notice dated 21.3.2022, and the consequential order dated 31.3.2022, allowing the Special Civil Application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 18:03:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1488 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312682</link>
      <description>The HC held that the notice under Section 148 for AY 2014-15, issued to a company post-amalgamation, was invalid as it was addressed to a non-existent entity. The petitioner had informed the jurisdictional AO about the amalgamation, which was acknowledged. Consequently, the HC quashed the notice dated 27.3.2021, the show cause notice dated 21.3.2022, and the consequential order dated 31.3.2022, allowing the Special Civil Application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>