https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312671 Trademark rights acquired through an assignment deed may vest on execution, while recordal with the Registrar under the Trade Marks Act serves evidentiary and record purposes and does not by itself negate the assignee's title to sue for infringement or passing off. Objections to a plaint based on disputed questions concerning authority to institute proceedings are not suited to threshold rejection under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Territorial jurisdiction may depend on pleaded business activity, supplies, notices and circulation within the forum. Interim protection may continue where the assignee establishes prima facie rights, balance of convenience and irreparable injury from continued impugned use. en-us Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Mar 2024 17:35:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312671 Trademark rights acquired through an assignment deed may vest on execution, while recordal with the Registrar under the Trade Marks Act serves evidentiary and record purposes and does not by itself negate the assignee's title to sue for infringement or passing off. Objections to a plaint based on disputed questions concerning authority to institute proceedings are not suited to threshold rejection under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Territorial jurisdiction may depend on pleaded business activity, supplies, notices and circulation within the forum. Interim protection may continue where the assignee establishes prima facie rights, balance of convenience and irreparable injury from continued impugned use. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312671