https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312669 Civil court jurisdiction was held not barred where the dispute went beyond deductions from wages or delay in payment and instead involved disputed accounting, mutual liabilities, and related liability questions under the Payment of Wages Act. A written acknowledgment of wage liability, even if coupled with conditions, accounting, or a stated set-off, was treated as sufficient to keep the claim within limitation under the Limitation Act. The defendants' alleged set-off or counter-claim, being based on separate transactions, required proper court-fee and was not an equitable set-off. Liability for fines paid by the manager was upheld because the evidence did not show they arose from his personal negligence. en-us Wed, 16 Mar 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Mar 2024 17:16:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312669 Civil court jurisdiction was held not barred where the dispute went beyond deductions from wages or delay in payment and instead involved disputed accounting, mutual liabilities, and related liability questions under the Payment of Wages Act. A written acknowledgment of wage liability, even if coupled with conditions, accounting, or a stated set-off, was treated as sufficient to keep the claim within limitation under the Limitation Act. The defendants' alleged set-off or counter-claim, being based on separate transactions, required proper court-fee and was not an equitable set-off. Liability for fines paid by the manager was upheld because the evidence did not show they arose from his personal negligence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Mar 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312669