<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Typographical or clerical error in e-way bill is not a ground for imposition of penalty</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12382</link>
    <description>Typographical or clerical mistakes in an e way bill do not, by themselves, justify penalty under Section 129 of the CGST Act where most required documents accompany the goods; the departmental presumption of tax evasion is rebuttable by material produced by the owner or transporter, and mere technical errors should not lead to penal consequences absent material showing deliberate evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 11:57:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 11:57:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Typographical or clerical error in e-way bill is not a ground for imposition of penalty</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12382</link>
      <description>Typographical or clerical mistakes in an e way bill do not, by themselves, justify penalty under Section 129 of the CGST Act where most required documents accompany the goods; the departmental presumption of tax evasion is rebuttable by material produced by the owner or transporter, and mere technical errors should not lead to penal consequences absent material showing deliberate evasion.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 11:57:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>