<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 59 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450278</link>
    <description>HC found the seizure order under Section 129 of U.P. GST Act invalid due to lack of confrontation with new grounds. The Court directed the revenue authority to treat the impugned order as a show cause notice, allowing the petitioner to respond within a week. The authority must provide an opportunity to explain and pass an appropriate order, ensuring natural justice principles are followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 59 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450278</link>
      <description>HC found the seizure order under Section 129 of U.P. GST Act invalid due to lack of confrontation with new grounds. The Court directed the revenue authority to treat the impugned order as a show cause notice, allowing the petitioner to respond within a week. The authority must provide an opportunity to explain and pass an appropriate order, ensuring natural justice principles are followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>