<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 57 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450276</link>
    <description>The SC reviewed a GST tax demand order challenging procedural fairness. The court found the original order defective due to inadequate consideration of the taxpayer&#039;s detailed reply and lack of opportunity for clarification. The matter was remitted to the proper officer for re-adjudication, with directions to seek necessary details and provide a fair hearing, without examining the substantive tax issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 57 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450276</link>
      <description>The SC reviewed a GST tax demand order challenging procedural fairness. The court found the original order defective due to inadequate consideration of the taxpayer&#039;s detailed reply and lack of opportunity for clarification. The matter was remitted to the proper officer for re-adjudication, with directions to seek necessary details and provide a fair hearing, without examining the substantive tax issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>