<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 54 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450273</link>
    <description>HC ruled that GST registration cancellation must be substantively justified, not mechanically applied retrospectively. The court modified the cancellation order from the original retrospective date to the show cause notice date, ensuring procedural fairness. While allowing tax authorities to pursue legitimate recovery, the judgment emphasized the need for clear reasoning and objective criteria when cancelling registration retrospectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 54 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450273</link>
      <description>HC ruled that GST registration cancellation must be substantively justified, not mechanically applied retrospectively. The court modified the cancellation order from the original retrospective date to the show cause notice date, ensuring procedural fairness. While allowing tax authorities to pursue legitimate recovery, the judgment emphasized the need for clear reasoning and objective criteria when cancelling registration retrospectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>