<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 48 - SIKKIM HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450267</link>
    <description>The recovery demand was allowed to be re-examined after the petitioner furnished additional information and the departmental report was received. The respondents were permitted to revisit the demand and take appropriate action in accordance with law, and the writ petition was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 48 - SIKKIM HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450267</link>
      <description>The recovery demand was allowed to be re-examined after the petitioner furnished additional information and the departmental report was received. The respondents were permitted to revisit the demand and take appropriate action in accordance with law, and the writ petition was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>