<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 39 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450258</link>
    <description>HC upheld validity of reopening the assessment, holding that post-01.04.2022 statutory changes make an audit objection a proper reason to reopen and it is not a mere change of opinion. The Assessing Authority acted within Clause (ii) of Explanation 1 to Section 148, so no error of law or jurisdiction was found. The writ petition was dismissed. The petitioner, if yet to file a return in response to the notice dated 07.02.2023, was permitted to file the return within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 39 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450258</link>
      <description>HC upheld validity of reopening the assessment, holding that post-01.04.2022 statutory changes make an audit objection a proper reason to reopen and it is not a mere change of opinion. The Assessing Authority acted within Clause (ii) of Explanation 1 to Section 148, so no error of law or jurisdiction was found. The writ petition was dismissed. The petitioner, if yet to file a return in response to the notice dated 07.02.2023, was permitted to file the return within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>