<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 38 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450257</link>
    <description>Reassessment notices issued beyond four years from the end of the assessment year under Section 147 are valid only if escaped income is attributable to the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. Here, the reopening rested on a later view that the Section 10B exemption had been wrongly allowed, but there was no material showing suppression of approvals or other relevant facts by the assessees. A later legal interpretation or a different inference from the same record cannot by itself justify reopening after the statutory four-year bar. The reassessment proceedings and consequential assessment orders were therefore incompetent and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:32:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 38 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450257</link>
      <description>Reassessment notices issued beyond four years from the end of the assessment year under Section 147 are valid only if escaped income is attributable to the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. Here, the reopening rested on a later view that the Section 10B exemption had been wrongly allowed, but there was no material showing suppression of approvals or other relevant facts by the assessees. A later legal interpretation or a different inference from the same record cannot by itself justify reopening after the statutory four-year bar. The reassessment proceedings and consequential assessment orders were therefore incompetent and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>