<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 26 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450245</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the Civil Appeal concerning the replacement of the appellant as Resolution Professional, ruling that the challenged orders align with Section 27 of the IBC, 2016. The decision confirms the validity of the replacement process under the specified legal framework, thereby upholding the lower court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:32:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 26 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450245</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the Civil Appeal concerning the replacement of the appellant as Resolution Professional, ruling that the challenged orders align with Section 27 of the IBC, 2016. The decision confirms the validity of the replacement process under the specified legal framework, thereby upholding the lower court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>