<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rules MoU Doesn&#039;t Block Future Claims, Overturns Decision to Deny Appellant&#039;s Right to Reapply for Breach.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75314</link>
    <description>While permitting withdrawal of Section 9 Application, Adjudicating Authority did not grant liberty to the Appellant to reapproach the Adjudicating Authority in the event of breach of Memorandum of Understanding - The NCLAT analyzed the terms of the MoU and concluded that it did not preclude the appellant from seeking redress in case of a breach by the corporate debtor. The MoU solely focused on the withdrawal of the Section 9 application, without relinquishing the appellant&#039;s rights arising from future contingencies. - The NCLAT partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to deny further liberty to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:31:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:31:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rules MoU Doesn&#039;t Block Future Claims, Overturns Decision to Deny Appellant&#039;s Right to Reapply for Breach.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75314</link>
      <description>While permitting withdrawal of Section 9 Application, Adjudicating Authority did not grant liberty to the Appellant to reapproach the Adjudicating Authority in the event of breach of Memorandum of Understanding - The NCLAT analyzed the terms of the MoU and concluded that it did not preclude the appellant from seeking redress in case of a breach by the corporate debtor. The MoU solely focused on the withdrawal of the Section 9 application, without relinquishing the appellant&#039;s rights arising from future contingencies. - The NCLAT partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to deny further liberty to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:31:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>