<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 22 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450241</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal, affirming the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s rejection of the Section 9 Application due to a genuine pre-existing dispute. The Corporate Debtor&#039;s email dated 11th July, 2022, substantiated claims of incomplete work and excess payments. The Tribunal advised the Appellant to seek alternative contractual remedies for outstanding dues, as Section 9 proceedings were deemed inappropriate for resolving such disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:31:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 22 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450241</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal, affirming the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s rejection of the Section 9 Application due to a genuine pre-existing dispute. The Corporate Debtor&#039;s email dated 11th July, 2022, substantiated claims of incomplete work and excess payments. The Tribunal advised the Appellant to seek alternative contractual remedies for outstanding dues, as Section 9 proceedings were deemed inappropriate for resolving such disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>