<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 13 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision. It held that if the Cenvat credit was available during the relevant period, it should be adjusted against the total service tax liability. The appeal was allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:31:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 13 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision. It held that if the Cenvat credit was available during the relevant period, it should be adjusted against the total service tax liability. The appeal was allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>