<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 10 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450229</link>
    <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad held that service tax under reverse charge mechanism was not applicable on remuneration paid to directors. The tribunal determined that directors, appointed through board resolution and treated as employees per income tax returns, maintained employer-employee relationship with the company. Following precedent from Bengal Beverages case, the tribunal concluded that whole-time directors are essentially company employees, and remuneration paid under Companies Act provisions constitutes employer-employee compensation. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed, establishing that director remuneration does not attract service tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 10 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450229</link>
      <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad held that service tax under reverse charge mechanism was not applicable on remuneration paid to directors. The tribunal determined that directors, appointed through board resolution and treated as employees per income tax returns, maintained employer-employee relationship with the company. Following precedent from Bengal Beverages case, the tribunal concluded that whole-time directors are essentially company employees, and remuneration paid under Companies Act provisions constitutes employer-employee compensation. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed, establishing that director remuneration does not attract service tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>