<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1899 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312656</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petitions challenging the assessment order, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies before approaching under Article 226. The petitioner must first appeal to the Appellate Deputy Commissioner. The court rejected the argument on retrospective amendment application, allowing the petitioner to challenge the order before the appellate authority. No costs were imposed, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 05:51:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1899 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312656</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petitions challenging the assessment order, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies before approaching under Article 226. The petitioner must first appeal to the Appellate Deputy Commissioner. The court rejected the argument on retrospective amendment application, allowing the petitioner to challenge the order before the appellate authority. No costs were imposed, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>