https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312643 Section 23-A(b) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act was read to permit eviction for the bona fide business need of a grandson where the accommodation is held for that person's benefit, so that ground was treated as maintainable. Sections 23-B and 23-C(1) were read together to require strict service of summons in the Second Schedule form, because the prescribed notice must warn the tenant to seek leave within fifteen days on affidavit and of the consequence of deemed admission. A general notice lacking those statutory warnings was treated as invalid, and the eviction order was set aside without proof of prejudice. en-us Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:02:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312643 Section 23-A(b) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act was read to permit eviction for the bona fide business need of a grandson where the accommodation is held for that person's benefit, so that ground was treated as maintainable. Sections 23-B and 23-C(1) were read together to require strict service of summons in the Second Schedule form, because the prescribed notice must warn the tenant to seek leave within fifteen days on affidavit and of the consequence of deemed admission. A general notice lacking those statutory warnings was treated as invalid, and the eviction order was set aside without proof of prejudice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312643