<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1345 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450194</link>
    <description>The SC condoned a 36-day delay in filing a restoration petition, thereby reinstating the case on the docket. Initially, the special leave petition was dismissed because the petitioner failed to rectify procedural defects within the designated timeframe. The decision effectively grants the petitioner another opportunity to pursue their appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1345 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450194</link>
      <description>The SC condoned a 36-day delay in filing a restoration petition, thereby reinstating the case on the docket. Initially, the special leave petition was dismissed because the petitioner failed to rectify procedural defects within the designated timeframe. The decision effectively grants the petitioner another opportunity to pursue their appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>