<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1344 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450193</link>
    <description>The HC held that the notice under Section 148A(b) was issued on a wrong email ID, not the petitioner company&#039;s registered email address as of the notice date. The correct registered email was identified based on consistent use in income tax returns, PAN database, and MCA records. Since the notice was sent to an incorrect email, the HC quashed the order under Section 148A(d), the notice under Section 148, and all consequential proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2025 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1344 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450193</link>
      <description>The HC held that the notice under Section 148A(b) was issued on a wrong email ID, not the petitioner company&#039;s registered email address as of the notice date. The correct registered email was identified based on consistent use in income tax returns, PAN database, and MCA records. Since the notice was sent to an incorrect email, the HC quashed the order under Section 148A(d), the notice under Section 148, and all consequential proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>