<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1342 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450191</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, affirming the deductibility under Section 37(1) and the classification of bad debts under Section 36(1)(vii) read with Section 36(2) of the Income Tax Act. The court found no infirmity in the ITAT&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 06:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1342 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450191</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, affirming the deductibility under Section 37(1) and the classification of bad debts under Section 36(1)(vii) read with Section 36(2) of the Income Tax Act. The court found no infirmity in the ITAT&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>