<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Penalty Proceedings Dismissed Due to Lack of Evidence in Diary Entries Linked to Partnership Projects.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75288</link>
    <description>Addition based on entries appearing in a diary seized from the assessee - Penalty proceedings u/s. 269SS, 269T and 271AAB - The CIT(A) held that the AO&#039;s findings were not sustainable as they lacked material evidence and reasoning. The CIT(A) noted that the transactions in the seized diary were related to the partnership firms&#039; projects, and the assessee was maintaining accounts for the partners of these firms. The CIT(A) also considered the disclosure made by the partnership firms while deciding the penalty. - The ITAT dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 07:55:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 07:55:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Penalty Proceedings Dismissed Due to Lack of Evidence in Diary Entries Linked to Partnership Projects.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75288</link>
      <description>Addition based on entries appearing in a diary seized from the assessee - Penalty proceedings u/s. 269SS, 269T and 271AAB - The CIT(A) held that the AO&#039;s findings were not sustainable as they lacked material evidence and reasoning. The CIT(A) noted that the transactions in the seized diary were related to the partnership firms&#039; projects, and the assessee was maintaining accounts for the partners of these firms. The CIT(A) also considered the disclosure made by the partnership firms while deciding the penalty. - The ITAT dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 07:55:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>