<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 57 - ORISSA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35975</link>
    <description>The High Court of Orissa upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision determining the assessee&#039;s status as Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) for assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73. Despite the revenue&#039;s assessment of the assessee as an individual, the Tribunal found evidence supporting the HUF status, including the assessee&#039;s declaration as the HUF&#039;s karta in previous returns. Relying on established legal principles, including Hindu law doctrines, the Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing its application to the case&#039;s specific facts. The parties were directed to bear their respective costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:27:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 57 - ORISSA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35975</link>
      <description>The High Court of Orissa upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision determining the assessee&#039;s status as Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) for assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73. Despite the revenue&#039;s assessment of the assessee as an individual, the Tribunal found evidence supporting the HUF status, including the assessee&#039;s declaration as the HUF&#039;s karta in previous returns. Relying on established legal principles, including Hindu law doctrines, the Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing its application to the case&#039;s specific facts. The parties were directed to bear their respective costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>