<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1313 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450162</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was maintainability of the SLPs in view of an efficacious statutory appellate remedy. The SC held that where a statutory appeal is available and the petitioners are willing to pursue it, the matter should be relegated to that remedy; accordingly, the SLPs were disposed of with liberty to file the statutory appeal within one month, and if filed within that period, the Tribunal was directed not to raise limitation in respect of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 17:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1313 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450162</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was maintainability of the SLPs in view of an efficacious statutory appellate remedy. The SC held that where a statutory appeal is available and the petitioners are willing to pursue it, the matter should be relegated to that remedy; accordingly, the SLPs were disposed of with liberty to file the statutory appeal within one month, and if filed within that period, the Tribunal was directed not to raise limitation in respect of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>