https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450146 Unauthorised commercial constructions on State land were found not to qualify for slum-dweller protection under the U.P. Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1962, because the occupants were running large showrooms and workshops with substantial business activity rather than living in deprived slum conditions. The Court held that being situated near the edge of a notified slum area did not extend statutory protection to such establishments. On the natural justice objection, the Court applied a prejudice-based approach and found no basis for remand because the admitted facts left only one lawful result, so the alleged non-supply of documents did not vitiate the proceedings. en-us Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Feb 2024 07:54:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450146 Unauthorised commercial constructions on State land were found not to qualify for slum-dweller protection under the U.P. Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1962, because the occupants were running large showrooms and workshops with substantial business activity rather than living in deprived slum conditions. The Court held that being situated near the edge of a notified slum area did not extend statutory protection to such establishments. On the natural justice objection, the Court applied a prejudice-based approach and found no basis for remand because the admitted facts left only one lawful result, so the alleged non-supply of documents did not vitiate the proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450146