<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Director&#039;s Liability in Cheque Dishonor Case Examined, Petitions Dismissed Under Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75261</link>
    <description>Dishonour of Cheque - Liability of a Director - principles of vicarious liability - petitioner had already resigned on 15.03.2014 as Director of the Company and was neither signatory of the cheques, nor Managing Director of the Company - Section 141 of NI Act - The court scrutinized the timing and validity of a clarificatory certificate issued by a Chartered Accountant regarding the petitioner&#039;s status as a non-executive director, highlighting its submission subsequent to the initiation of legal proceedings. Ultimately, the court dismissed the petitions, imposing costs on the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 07:54:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 07:54:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Director&#039;s Liability in Cheque Dishonor Case Examined, Petitions Dismissed Under Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75261</link>
      <description>Dishonour of Cheque - Liability of a Director - principles of vicarious liability - petitioner had already resigned on 15.03.2014 as Director of the Company and was neither signatory of the cheques, nor Managing Director of the Company - Section 141 of NI Act - The court scrutinized the timing and validity of a clarificatory certificate issued by a Chartered Accountant regarding the petitioner&#039;s status as a non-executive director, highlighting its submission subsequent to the initiation of legal proceedings. Ultimately, the court dismissed the petitions, imposing costs on the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 07:54:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>