https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450143 A complaint against a non-executive additional director was quashed where the pleadings contained no specific averments showing that he was in charge of and responsible for the company's business at the relevant time. Mere assertions that directors handled day-to-day affairs were held insufficient without particulars of the role actually played, especially where the complaint did not allege that he signed the cheques or held the office of Managing Director or Joint Managing Director. On the undisputed material, the petitioner was not shown to have been responsible for the conduct of business, and the summoning order was set aside qua him. en-us Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 17:46:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450143 A complaint against a non-executive additional director was quashed where the pleadings contained no specific averments showing that he was in charge of and responsible for the company's business at the relevant time. Mere assertions that directors handled day-to-day affairs were held insufficient without particulars of the role actually played, especially where the complaint did not allege that he signed the cheques or held the office of Managing Director or Joint Managing Director. On the undisputed material, the petitioner was not shown to have been responsible for the conduct of business, and the summoning order was set aside qua him. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450143