<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1292 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450141</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jodhpur ruled in favor of the assessee regarding cash deposits during demonetization period. The tribunal held that when the AO did not doubt the sales, purchases, stock, and gross profit declared by the assessee, the cash deposits from such sales cannot be questioned under Section 69A. The court found direct nexus between cash deposits and sales realization. Additionally, non-maintenance of stock register alone cannot justify rejection of books under Section 145(3). The tribunal also accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation for stock valuation discrepancies during survey, noting goods sold on approval were not entered in stock. All additions were quashed and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1292 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450141</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jodhpur ruled in favor of the assessee regarding cash deposits during demonetization period. The tribunal held that when the AO did not doubt the sales, purchases, stock, and gross profit declared by the assessee, the cash deposits from such sales cannot be questioned under Section 69A. The court found direct nexus between cash deposits and sales realization. Additionally, non-maintenance of stock register alone cannot justify rejection of books under Section 145(3). The tribunal also accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation for stock valuation discrepancies during survey, noting goods sold on approval were not entered in stock. All additions were quashed and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>