https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312634 Judicial review of an expert police-selection process is confined to illegality, irrationality, procedural impropriety, or bias, and courts will not reweigh comparative merit or substitute their own view for that of the empanelment body. The Draft Guidelines implementing Prakash Singh were held to provide an objective assessment method, and the identification of five core policing areas for evaluating range of experience was within the Committee's discretion and not shown to be arbitrary or contrary to law. The belated bias objection also failed because the concerned member's participation was known, no protest was raised, and waiver and acquiescence barred the challenge. en-us Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Sep 2025 13:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312634 Judicial review of an expert police-selection process is confined to illegality, irrationality, procedural impropriety, or bias, and courts will not reweigh comparative merit or substitute their own view for that of the empanelment body. The Draft Guidelines implementing Prakash Singh were held to provide an objective assessment method, and the identification of five core policing areas for evaluating range of experience was within the Committee's discretion and not shown to be arbitrary or contrary to law. The belated bias objection also failed because the concerned member's participation was known, no protest was raised, and waiver and acquiescence barred the challenge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312634