https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312633 Promotions to the IPS under the governing regulations required the Selection Committee to assess only the service record for the prescribed five-year period ending 31 March of the year preceding the select list year, so later Annual Confidential Reports were irrelevant. The Committee was entitled to make an independent overall relative assessment of eligible officers on the full service record rather than being bound by State gradings, and judicial review was limited to mala fides, bias, arbitrariness, or violation of the rules. The scheme also permitted provisional inclusion of an officer facing disciplinary proceedings, with final inclusion and appointment to follow once cleared. en-us Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 17:45:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312633 Promotions to the IPS under the governing regulations required the Selection Committee to assess only the service record for the prescribed five-year period ending 31 March of the year preceding the select list year, so later Annual Confidential Reports were irrelevant. The Committee was entitled to make an independent overall relative assessment of eligible officers on the full service record rather than being bound by State gradings, and judicial review was limited to mala fides, bias, arbitrariness, or violation of the rules. The scheme also permitted provisional inclusion of an officer facing disciplinary proceedings, with final inclusion and appointment to follow once cleared. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312633