<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 70 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35961</link>
    <description>The court ruled against M/s. Sir Shadilal Sugar and General Mills Ltd., disallowing their claim for deduction of a trading loss in Govt. securities for the assessment year 1964-65. The court found that the securities were purchased for investment purposes, and the loss was deemed capital in nature. The assessee failed to demonstrate a compelling reason for selling the securities before maturity, leading to the disallowance of the deduction. The court upheld the decision in favor of the department, awarding costs of Rs. 200.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:56:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 70 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35961</link>
      <description>The court ruled against M/s. Sir Shadilal Sugar and General Mills Ltd., disallowing their claim for deduction of a trading loss in Govt. securities for the assessment year 1964-65. The court found that the securities were purchased for investment purposes, and the loss was deemed capital in nature. The assessee failed to demonstrate a compelling reason for selling the securities before maturity, leading to the disallowance of the deduction. The court upheld the decision in favor of the department, awarding costs of Rs. 200.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>