<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1277 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450126</link>
    <description>The court allowed petitioners to withdraw their writ petitions challenging the pre-deposit requirement under Section 129-E of the Customs Act, 1962, and granted them liberty to file an appeal before CESTAT within one month. The court assured that CESTAT would not raise the issue of limitation if the appeal is timely filed. All pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1277 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450126</link>
      <description>The court allowed petitioners to withdraw their writ petitions challenging the pre-deposit requirement under Section 129-E of the Customs Act, 1962, and granted them liberty to file an appeal before CESTAT within one month. The court assured that CESTAT would not raise the issue of limitation if the appeal is timely filed. All pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>