<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1267 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450116</link>
    <description>CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed appeal regarding conversion of shipping bills from Drawback scheme to Drawback and ROSCTL scheme beyond three-month circular deadline. Tribunal held that procedural time limits in circulars cannot override statutory provisions under Section 149 of Customs Act, which permits amendments based on documentary evidence existing at time of clearance. Since export goods were undisputed and examination levels for both schemes were identical, appellant&#039;s entitlement to scheme benefits could not be denied due to procedural lapse. Circular&#039;s liberalizing intent should facilitate scheme conversions rather than impose rigid restrictions not contemplated in parent statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1267 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450116</link>
      <description>CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed appeal regarding conversion of shipping bills from Drawback scheme to Drawback and ROSCTL scheme beyond three-month circular deadline. Tribunal held that procedural time limits in circulars cannot override statutory provisions under Section 149 of Customs Act, which permits amendments based on documentary evidence existing at time of clearance. Since export goods were undisputed and examination levels for both schemes were identical, appellant&#039;s entitlement to scheme benefits could not be denied due to procedural lapse. Circular&#039;s liberalizing intent should facilitate scheme conversions rather than impose rigid restrictions not contemplated in parent statute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>