<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1266 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450115</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, reducing the redemption fine and penalty imposed under the Customs Act 1962. Recognizing the Appellant&#039;s bona fide conduct and significant demurrage costs due to delayed shipment, the Tribunal modified the orders. In Appeal No. C/10327/16, the fine and penalty were reduced to Rs. 25,00,000 and Rs. 4,00,000, respectively. In Appeal No. C/10623/16, they were reduced to Rs. 20,00,000 and Rs. 3,00,000, respectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:35:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1266 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450115</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, reducing the redemption fine and penalty imposed under the Customs Act 1962. Recognizing the Appellant&#039;s bona fide conduct and significant demurrage costs due to delayed shipment, the Tribunal modified the orders. In Appeal No. C/10327/16, the fine and penalty were reduced to Rs. 25,00,000 and Rs. 4,00,000, respectively. In Appeal No. C/10623/16, they were reduced to Rs. 20,00,000 and Rs. 3,00,000, respectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>