https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450099 A non-speaking appellate order cannot constitute valid adjudication because reasons are required to sustain a decision. The SC held that the CESTAT's order allowing the Department's appeal without recording reasons was unsustainable. It set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for fresh consideration and a reasoned decision. The dispute was therefore not decided on merits and was returned for proper adjudication in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Aug 2024 14:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450099 A non-speaking appellate order cannot constitute valid adjudication because reasons are required to sustain a decision. The SC held that the CESTAT's order allowing the Department's appeal without recording reasons was unsustainable. It set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for fresh consideration and a reasoned decision. The dispute was therefore not decided on merits and was returned for proper adjudication in accordance with law. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450099