https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450098 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order, and directed that the refund amount, along with interest, be paid to the appellant rather than credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund. It was determined that the appellant had not passed on the differential duty burden to the customer, thereby entitling them to the refund under section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. en-us Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:34:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450098 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order, and directed that the refund amount, along with interest, be paid to the appellant rather than credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund. It was determined that the appellant had not passed on the differential duty burden to the customer, thereby entitling them to the refund under section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450098