<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (1) TMI 48 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35955</link>
    <description>The High Court reduced penalties for late filing of wealth-tax returns for assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72. The Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the chartered accountant&#039;s advice was deemed erroneous. The Court ordered penalties to be calculated from January to April 1971 for 1970-71 and allowed the petition for 1971-72, directing the department to refund penalties imposed for both years. Judge B. Lentin found the Commissioner&#039;s actions to be incorrect and ordered the reduction of penalties and refunds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (1) TMI 48 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35955</link>
      <description>The High Court reduced penalties for late filing of wealth-tax returns for assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72. The Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the chartered accountant&#039;s advice was deemed erroneous. The Court ordered penalties to be calculated from January to April 1971 for 1970-71 and allowed the petition for 1971-72, directing the department to refund penalties imposed for both years. Judge B. Lentin found the Commissioner&#039;s actions to be incorrect and ordered the reduction of penalties and refunds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>