<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1374 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312613</link>
    <description>Section 482 inherent power is not wholly barred by the prohibition on a second revision under Section 397(3) CrPC; it may still be invoked in exceptional cases to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice, but only sparingly. The Court also held that materials can justify framing of charge where lottery tickets are alleged to have been printed contrary to the governing statutory conditions, read with the Act&#039;s requirement of authentic ticket control, and where the alleged deception extends to the purchasing public, not merely the State. On that basis, the challenge to the charges failed and the prosecution was allowed to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 06:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1374 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312613</link>
      <description>Section 482 inherent power is not wholly barred by the prohibition on a second revision under Section 397(3) CrPC; it may still be invoked in exceptional cases to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice, but only sparingly. The Court also held that materials can justify framing of charge where lottery tickets are alleged to have been printed contrary to the governing statutory conditions, read with the Act&#039;s requirement of authentic ticket control, and where the alleged deception extends to the purchasing public, not merely the State. On that basis, the challenge to the charges failed and the prosecution was allowed to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>