<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1372 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312611</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in a Customs Act investigation was considered against the settled safeguards governing arrest where the alleged offence is punishable up to seven years. The Court weighed the nature of the accusations, the applicant&#039;s explanation and business records, the absence of criminal antecedents, the pending scrutiny by the Customs Department, and the need to balance investigation with personal liberty. It noted that the applicant had already filed a reply with supporting documents and that further adjudicatory and settlement remedies were still available. On that basis, arrest was not shown to be necessary and protection against arrest was granted subject to cooperation with the investigation and compliance with conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 06:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1372 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312611</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in a Customs Act investigation was considered against the settled safeguards governing arrest where the alleged offence is punishable up to seven years. The Court weighed the nature of the accusations, the applicant&#039;s explanation and business records, the absence of criminal antecedents, the pending scrutiny by the Customs Department, and the need to balance investigation with personal liberty. It noted that the applicant had already filed a reply with supporting documents and that further adjudicatory and settlement remedies were still available. On that basis, arrest was not shown to be necessary and protection against arrest was granted subject to cooperation with the investigation and compliance with conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>