https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312610 The Bombay HC dismissed a writ petition filed 8 months after an order was passed, despite earlier liberty granted to file. The court held that liberty to file is mere phraseology without statutory sanction and does not confer jurisdiction to review finalized orders. Such liberty only allows exploration of alternative remedies but cannot resurrect concluded matters. The court ruled that successor courts are not bound to consider proceedings maintainable merely because liberty was previously granted, and dismissed the petition as non-maintainable in limine. en-us Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 06:02:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312610 The Bombay HC dismissed a writ petition filed 8 months after an order was passed, despite earlier liberty granted to file. The court held that liberty to file is mere phraseology without statutory sanction and does not confer jurisdiction to review finalized orders. Such liberty only allows exploration of alternative remedies but cannot resurrect concluded matters. The court ruled that successor courts are not bound to consider proceedings maintainable merely because liberty was previously granted, and dismissed the petition as non-maintainable in limine. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312610