<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 721 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312609</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction for police investigation under the Code of Criminal Procedure was examined in relation to alleged threatening and blackmailing calls made to the complainant&#039;s residence at Chengannur. The text states that, under Sections 156(1) and 177 CrPC, investigation must correspond to the jurisdiction of the court competent to inquire into or try the offence, and that the Museum Police Station had no territorial nexus with the alleged crime. It further notes that forwarding the complaint by higher police authorities, or a later statement linking the matter to Thiruvananthapuram, could not cure the original want of jurisdiction. The revision was allowed, the accused was discharged, and transfer to the proper police station was left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:31:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 721 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312609</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction for police investigation under the Code of Criminal Procedure was examined in relation to alleged threatening and blackmailing calls made to the complainant&#039;s residence at Chengannur. The text states that, under Sections 156(1) and 177 CrPC, investigation must correspond to the jurisdiction of the court competent to inquire into or try the offence, and that the Museum Police Station had no territorial nexus with the alleged crime. It further notes that forwarding the complaint by higher police authorities, or a later statement linking the matter to Thiruvananthapuram, could not cure the original want of jurisdiction. The revision was allowed, the accused was discharged, and transfer to the proper police station was left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>